IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Recommended
BootDisk.com

Active Users

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Vista UAC & Reverse psychology, Interesting!
ispy
post Aug 28 2008, 06:37 AM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Tutorial Writer
Posts: 565
Thank(s): 56
Joined: 12-August 07
From: PILGRIM
Member No.: 10,068



Hi all (IMG:../forums/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) ,

"Allegedly"

Vista UAC is annoying by design. a M$ engineer states "The reason we put UAC into the platform was to annoy users, I'm Serious"

If you're running Windows Vista, you're familiar with User Access Control (UAC). It's the security subsystem that pops up those irritating dialog boxes asking whether you really want to install software, or modify system files, or write to the Registry.
UAC may be Vista's most-hated feature, but as it turns out, it may also be its best-designed. As reported by Ars Technica, UAC was created with a very specific purpose in mind: to annoy you.
Ars picked up this tidbit at the recent RSA 2008 security conference in San Francisco, where David Cross, Microsoft's product unit manager for Windows security, discussed the company's security directions post-Vista. "The reason we put UAC into the platform was to annoy users. I'm serious," Cross is quoted as saying.
More cynical observers will note that this is a longstanding Microsoft business strategy. But in this case, believe it or not, it actually makes some sense.
Before Vista, most Windows users did their day-to-day computing with full Administrator access to their PCs. This gave them -- and by extension, the software they used -- total control over the system, including the ability to modify critical system files.
That degree of freedom grants a lot of power, but it leads to unpleasant side effects. Most importantly, when you're logged in as an Administrator, any Trojan horses, viruses, or other malware you unwittingly download will have free reign to attack your system with impunity.
Vista attempts to correct this legacy of bad behavior by only granting Administrator privileges to applications in situations where it's absolutely necessary. Unfortunately, developers have been spoiled by the old-style security model. Too often, they write their software in such a way that it actually requires Administrator privileges, even if there might be another (albeit more complicated) way to do the same work.
That's where UAC comes in. When a program tries to gain Administrator privilege, UAC pops up a dialog box, forcing the user to click a button. As Cross pointed out, that's annoying, and intentionally so. The idea is that users will shy away from programs that cause too many UAC dialogs to pop up, out of sheer irritation. If developers don't want to scare users away from their software, they're forced to rewrite it so that it plays nice under the new security rules.
Microsoft is onto a whole new paradigm here: modifying user behavior via reverse psychology. By making users click "OK" in a bunch of security dialogs, Microsoft is actually discouraging them from continuing.
Of course, so far this strategy has only met with limited success. Many users have preferred to disable UAC, rather than participate in Microsoft's social-engineering experiment. But isn't it nice to know that the good folks in Redmond are thinking outside the box?

Regards & Best Wishes,

ispy (IMG:../forums/style_emoticons/default/smiling9.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
psc
post Aug 28 2008, 07:27 AM
Post #2


Guru
***

Group: .script developer
Posts: 5,404
Thank(s): 83
Joined: 14-July 06
From: Korschenbroich
Member No.: 3


Germany


Thanks, ispy!

That is a nice explanation of somebackground, and may help the user to become a bit less angry on popups.

Peter
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Following 1 Users Say Thank You to psc For This Useful Post:
ispy
Nuno Brito
post Aug 28 2008, 12:06 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: .script developer
Posts: 6,137
Thank(s): 127
Joined: 13-July 06
From: Azores
Member No.: 1


Portugal


It should even go further also ask the user to type the respective password.

Don't really see much point on having annoying popups, if a program requires administrative permissions once then it shouldn't bother people to click "Ok" everytime an admin action is made by the same program or related processes.

In linux when you use sudo once, it will remain as valid for a short period of time for the next times you call administrative operations.

Eventually I do recognize that MS engineers were very right. I got so annoyed with Vista that later moved to linux and now run XP from an emulated box altogether.

(IMG:../forums/style_emoticons/default/cheers.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Following 1 Users Say Thank You to Nuno Brito For This Useful Post:
ispy
ispy
post Aug 28 2008, 05:44 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member
***

Group: Tutorial Writer
Posts: 565
Thank(s): 56
Joined: 12-August 07
From: PILGRIM
Member No.: 10,068



Hi Guys (IMG:../forums/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) ,

You never know with this type of post the reception it might receive, I can however say that I cannot lay any claim as to the authorship of this article as it was found elsewhere on the net, but irrespective I thought it would be thought provoking.

Many thanks for your feedback it is much appreciated!

R&R (Regards & Respect),

ispy (IMG:../forums/style_emoticons/default/cheers.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jaclaz
post Aug 28 2008, 06:22 PM
Post #5


Finder
***

Group: Advanced user
Posts: 3,001
Thank(s): 120
Joined: 14-July 06
Member No.: 2


Italy


@ispy

As long as you do not try passing it as "NEWS", it's OK with me:
http://www.boot-land.net/forums/?showtopic=4659
(IMG:../forums/style_emoticons/default/happy22.gif)

jaclaz
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Following 1 Users Say Thank You to jaclaz For This Useful Post:
ispy
ispy
post Aug 28 2008, 07:25 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
***

Group: Tutorial Writer
Posts: 565
Thank(s): 56
Joined: 12-August 07
From: PILGRIM
Member No.: 10,068



@ Jaclaz (IMG:../forums/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) ,

Old news it would appear, one step behind you

R&R,

ispy (IMG:../forums/style_emoticons/default/cheers.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
« Next Oldest · News · Next Newest »
 

Fast ReplyReply to this topicStart new topic
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Display Mode: Standard · Switch to: Linear+ · Switch to: Outline

Track this topic · Email this topic · Print this topic · Subscribe to this forum

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th October 2008 - 08:52 AM

W3C XHTML • © 2008 Boot Land • All rights reserved • W3C CSS