QUOTE (jeroentuin @ Jul 9 2009, 04:08 PM)

@ jaclaz
i am totally new in the bootable scene:$, so ....
which one will give me the least change to failure:P
QUOTE (jaclaz @ Jul 8 2009, 06:25 PM)


JFYI:
http://ccollomb.free.fr/blog/?p=59QUOTE (Lancelot @ Jul 8 2009, 07:46 PM)

Reminding jaclaz is the master of the boot, I advice you to follow his advices.
Though of course your recommendation is appreciated

, I am failing to see ANY alternative he may follow....

QUOTE (Lancelot @ Jul 8 2009, 07:46 PM)

@jaclaz
a little question about "from PE" method. I love wimb's tools, but never used for booting "from PE".
Instead I use LiveXP with following steps:
1) prepare partition primary/ntfs/active,
2) than set partition drive letter to C:\
3) copy xp setup(cd) to C:\xpsetup
4) than doubleclick C:\xpsetup\i386\winnt32.exe
so far method working nicely, am I missing sth ?
Who knows what you may be missing?

The whole point of
Wimb's method (the "from PE" one):
QUOTE (jaclaz @ Jul 8 2009, 06:25 PM)

is to help in creating a bootable USB running a "standard" LiveXP (as per Amalux's Tutorials), and further help in adding additions, like Drivers Pack and similar +
a whole lot more things, the latter ones being symptoms of the "featuritis", a common syndrome among developers, from which
Wimb also suffers.

Since you already know:
- how to make a bootable USB stick
- how to build a LiveXP
- how to add additions
You should have NO "need" for using it, though you might want to try it at next occasion (as opposed to ask philosophical questions about it

) and actually time the install, and see whether the method "keeping source files on stick" is faster than first copying source to target and then run WINNT32.EXE.

jaclaz
P.S.: Corrected links to point directly to post #2:
http://www.911cd.net/forums//index.php?sho...=16713&st=1and to post #1:
http://www.911cd.net/forums//index.php?sho...=16713&st=0on the referenced thread.