Digg this topic Add to my del.icio.us Submit to SlashDot  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 4DOS is now Open Source, (and it has been updated)
jaclaz
post Jul 5 2007, 06:52 PM
Post #1


Finder
***

Group: Advanced user
Posts: 1,412
Joined: 14-July 06
Member No.: 2


Italy


It was a few months, actually more than one year (IMG:http://www.boot-land.net/forums/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) since I checked news about 4DOS, and look what I have found today:
http://www.4dos.hit.bg/
QUOTE
Thanks to Rex Conn who released the source code of build 132, it is possible to revive the project and continue development of the King of the DOS/W9x command interpreters!


jaclaz
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nuno Brito
post Jul 5 2007, 08:25 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: .script developer
Posts: 4,565
Joined: 13-July 06
From: Azores
Member No.: 1


Portugal


It was surely my favourite interpreter at the time - it was so much to code in .btm (batch to memory) language and be able to use descript.ion files to add a tag to describe a file.

Really good days spend, never used much the newer take command 32 (windows version) but still left good memories..

(IMG:http://www.boot-land.net/forums/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)


This was also fun to read:
QUOTE
# Rex C. Conn for writing 4DOS (1986-2004) and releasing its sources
# Tom Rawson for founding JP Software (JP stands for Jamaica Plain)


Good to see it was last updated on 25 of june this year! (IMG:http://www.boot-land.net/forums/style_emoticons/default/thumbup.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
psc
post Jul 6 2007, 02:42 PM
Post #3


Guru
***

Group: .script developer
Posts: 3,718
Joined: 14-July 06
From: Korschenbroich, Germany
Member No.: 3


Germany


Some memories 'The good old time ...'
Attached Image


Peter
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nuno Brito
post Jul 6 2007, 02:52 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member
***

Group: .script developer
Posts: 4,565
Joined: 13-July 06
From: Azores
Member No.: 1


Portugal


Wow.. (IMG:http://www.boot-land.net/forums/style_emoticons/default/blink.gif) (IMG:http://www.boot-land.net/forums/style_emoticons/default/thumbup.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paraglider
post Jul 7 2007, 05:27 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
***

Group: .script developer
Posts: 179
Joined: 12-August 06
From: NC,USA
Member No.: 153


United States


I also at one time used 4dos / 4nt. These days with all the extensions MS added to cmd.exe I find I no longer need it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
wendy
post Jul 8 2007, 08:21 AM
Post #6


Advanced Member
***

Group: Lady
Posts: 58
Joined: 16-July 06
From: one mile from the QR main line
Member No.: 13


Australia


I still use 4dos/4os2/4nt and sometimes tcmd. Rexx is still a mainstay.

I been using 4dos from vers 4.0, 4os2 from 1.1 and 4nt from 2.5.

There are two functions that cmd.exe under NT does not support all that well, along with the reading of registry into environment variables. I use EXTPROC a lot, feeding this usually into a REXX script or so. For example, my web page http://www.geocities.com/os2fan2/gloss/index.html is the result of a single EXTPROC .cmd file.

Still, it is largely possible to do these sorts of things in CMD.EXE, but you start to delve deep into the sorts of tricks of DOS 3.3-DOS 5.0 days, even with cmd extentions.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paraglider
post Jul 8 2007, 01:36 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
***

Group: .script developer
Posts: 179
Joined: 12-August 06
From: NC,USA
Member No.: 153


United States


I had forgotten about my OS/2 days. I also used 4OS2. Its a pity IBM gave up on OS/2.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
« Next Oldest · FreeDos and Dos · Next Newest »
 

Fast ReplyReply to this topicStart new topic

Members Who Viewed Topic Today ()

 

Display Mode: Standard · Switch to: Linear+ · Switch to: Outline

Track this topic · Email this topic · Print this topic · Subscribe to this forum

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th January 2008 - 09:08 AM

MKPortal ©2003-2006 mkportal.it